Material Thickness When Choosing a Rockwell Scale

Are you concerned about which Rockwell scale to use for thin materials?

Of primary importance in Rockwell scale selection is material thickness. Since the 30 Rockwell scales are distinguished by total test force as well as the indenter type, a load or force that is excessive for a given material thickness will ultimately be influenced by the support anvil as the material is fully penetrated. Interruption in material flow such as this can result in erroneous readings and significant misinterpretation of the actual material hardness.

To assist with the decision process, ASTM provides scale thickness requirements both in tabular as well as graphical form. We recommend that these are used as a reference guide in deciding suitable scale based on your material thickness. A general, approximate only, rule is that the material should be a minimum of 10 times the depth of the indentation when using a diamond type indenter and at least 15 times the depth when using a ball type indenter. If necessary, the actual depth of any indentation can be calculated to confirm this requirement is being met. Typically, depth calculation is not necessary as the ASTM reference tables and graphs provide adequate information to make an educated decision. A rule of thumb that should be followed in order to ensure accurate test results is that no deformation of the material should be evident on the supporting (underside) surface of the material. As the thickness of the material is reduced, it becomes necessary to reduce the applied force to reduce “breakthrough” of the indenter. This can be achieved by choosing a Rockwell scale that utilizes lower test forces and has the appropriate conversion values.

As an example of referencing the tables to determine suitable hardness scale, suppose there is a requirement is to perform hardness test on a sheet of steel that is 0.51 mm. (0.20 in.) thick that has an approximate hardness value of 57 HRC. ASTM E18 shows that material of 57 HRC hardness must have a thickness of 0.76 mm (0.030 in) to obtain valid results, eliminating the possibility to perform a standard HRC scale test on this particular sample. Reviewing ASTM E 140 conversion tables illustrates that 57 HRC approximately converts to 15N 88.9, 30N 74.8, or 45N 63.2. Referring to the ASTM minimum thickness chart we can see that for material .51 mm thick there are two scales to choose from, HR30N and HR45N. According to the chart, at .51 mm the material should be at least HRN45 63 or HRN30 57 indicating that either converted scale is suitable (remember, the converted value is HR45N 63.2 and HR30N 74.8). When more than one choice is available it is recommended that the higher test force scale is chosen, in this case HR45N.

If a suitable Rockwell scale is not possible due to not meeting minimum thickness requirements, the material may be tested on either the Knoop or Vickers Microhardness scales.

Many Rockwell hardness blocks are available on the Quick Ship program.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Optimize Your Sectioning
Buehler an ITW Company
Buehler Products

Applications of Metamaterials

With Prof. Lorenzo Valdevit

An overview of the definitions and classes of metamaterials will be provided with a specific emphasis to the applications as lightweight structural materials. The various features of structural metamaterials will be discussed as well as the role of metal additive manufacturing in enabling the scale of these materials. Future pathways to the implementation of these unique materials will be presented.

Applications of Light Metals

With Dr. Carl Söderhjelm

The lecture will first review the prototypical structures and identifying properties of various industrially relevant light metals. Then, several case studies will be presented to demonstrate the novel use of these materials in light weighting across different fields. The lecture will conclude with emerging materials and tools to design them.

Additive Manufacturing Overview

With Mr. Brandon Fields

The field of metal additive manufacturing will be discussed with a highlight to the variety of technologies currently in use and identify the industry leading techniques. The core principals of each will be presented along with comparisons and use cases for each.

Powder Metallurgy Versus Conventional Processing

With Prof. Diran Apelian or Dr. Ben MacDonald

Powder metallurgy as a class of processing technologies will be covered with an emphasis to the key differentiations with conventional processing. The implication of critical solidification parameters including cooling rate will be reviewed as they affect the refinement of microstructures and the presence of metastable structures. Traditional consolidation approaches to creating bulk parts will be discussed as well as the use of metal powder as a feedstock to additive manufacturing.

The Linkage of Processing Structure Properties

With Dr. Ben MacDonald

This lecture will serve to established and review the core metallurgical principles that are essential to understanding materials as a system. With an overview of the hierarchical structural features of metals, fundamentals of solidification, wrought processing, and heat treatment, the interconnected relationships of processing, structure, and properties will be established.

Current Trends in Light Weighting of Structural Materials

With Prof. Diran Apelian

This lecture will serve as a motivation for the course with emphasis on current trends in light weighting of structural materials. Global context to the need for light weighting will be provided as it is critical to a variety of fields from aerospace to the electrification of transportation. Paths forward will be proposed, specifically the unique potential of metal additive manufacturing to accomplishing these goals. This lecture will conclude by introducing the structure of the lectures that will be presented in the course.